» Social movement novorossiya shooters. Igor Strelkov's Novorossiya movement

Social movement novorossiya shooters. Igor Strelkov's Novorossiya movement

Igor Strelkov. Photo: Georgy Malets

“We believe that meeting the requirements of heavy truck drivers will have a beneficial effect on the development of small and medium-sized businesses, the transport industry and the economy as a whole. system ", - said in a statement of the movement" Novorossiya " (Strelkov's structure is also called the All-Russian National Movement (ORNM) or the "January 25" Committee (K25).

"Like the strikers, ORND / K25 believes that it is necessary to:

1. Complete abolition of the PLATON system or its reorganization for transit transport with the transfer of control over it to the state, and not to some commercial structures.
2. Abolition of the tax on vehicle owners (for this there is an excise tax on fuel).
3. Termination of attempts to regulate the work and rest regime of drivers (RTO) outside the framework of traffic rules and relevant medical tests - the driver of any vehicle has the right to determine its own RTO. Cancellation of forced installation of tachographs. Installing tachographs is a private matter for car owners.
4. Putting things in order at weight control, eliminating a 20 percent error in the readings of automatic scales (or taking into account the error in favor of the driver).
5. Providing carriers with an economic justification for calculating the amount of excise duty on fuel and a report on the use of the collected funds.
6. In case of non-fulfillment of the economic requirements by the government - the resignation of the government, the formation of a cabinet of national trust, and in case of non-fulfillment of this requirement and the preservation of the Medvedev government - distrust of the president. "

Movement "Novorossiya"


"The Novorossiya movement is not for Putin, but for Russia. If the president does the right things, we are for him, if the wrong ones are against. We are for justice, which is why our movement and personally Igor Strelkov decided to support the truckers' strike," he said (one of the leaders of the movement, the head of the Moscow headquarters of the organization Alexey) Sorokova, present at the protest parking in the capital near the shopping center "Chocolate", at the 2nd kilometer of the Moscow Ring Road.

According to him, the leaders of Novorossiya are not embarrassed by the fact that earlier the drivers' protest was supported by many opposition politicians.

“If the belolentochniki provided support earlier, this is their business. I was in the Donbass, did not fight, but delivered humanitarian aid to Lugansk and Donetsk, and in 2016, on Easter, I brought the“ blessed fire ”to the front. I am not interested in either Navalny or Maltsev, I do not care what they say, "the activist explained his position.

However, as the truckers themselves assure, the "novoros" arrived at the site in his personal capacity.

"We have not yet negotiated with Strelkov's movement, but we welcome Alexei as a private person, we have nothing against him, he is our colleague, came to the meeting, expressed a desire to join, and therefore he is here," said Sergei Rudametkin, coordinator of Moscow truckers. adding that Sorokova is himself a carrier by profession, and therefore has every right to participate in the strike.

Yes, of course, Strelkov is a man correct, in the sense that as a commander he is professional, on the other hand, to a certain extent he is “unmercenary” and does the right thing to expose the grabber in the Kremlin and LDNR and think about the strategy of the Lao PDR in this war.
But he has political ideas ... "Crush Ukraine", create in its place "Greater Novorossia" ... In 1945, the victorious countries did not aim to create a completely different country in place of Germany, it was about eliminating fascism in the state.
And then: doesn't Kiev from the XII century have the right to statehood (what the government should be in Kiev is another question!). Anti-Ukrainianism is somehow incomprehensible, and he turned the broad Eurasian idea back into the idea of ​​the “Russian world”. Isn't there a lot of political science ambitions for a military expert? Although we need people devoted to the interests of the people ... We need an example of the moral behavior of leaders ...
But as an intellectual, Strelkov is again more of a military expert: Of course, he understands that if the slogan of Greater Novorossiya is put forward, then in Kharkov, Odessa, etc. (maybe) the guerrilla movement will become more active and it will be easier for the Lao PDR fighters to fight! Otherwise, the airport and the Sands cannot be recaptured (difficult) ... On the site of the movement of Novorossiya (it is not clear that this is Novorossia) it is better to create just something like a committee to help the fighters (and residents !!!) of the Lao PDR. And Lao PDR is simply Donbass (Luhansk region is also part of Donbass) ...
From the standpoint of the Yervasian idea, the LDNR is a part of the Eurasian civilization, and the West of Ukraine is rather a part of Western civilization. Hence the need for either the federalization of Ukraine with a division into only TWO parts, or the separation of the Republic of the LDNR as (in the future) an independent country.
There is no need for any "Russian world", nationalism, anti-Ukrainianism, self-glorification of Orthodoxy, and, moreover, only Russian Orthodoxy (although Orthodoxy came to us from Kiev!). It's just that a committee of humanitarian aid to the fighters of the LDNR is created, and that's it. Fighters are fighting now, not Strelkov. They know better what to fight for. And they are now fighting for Peski, for the airport - this is already a big real deal. Keep residents safe! They do not need to ascribe their political goals, "lead".
And history will put everything in its place (perhaps a broad Eurasian idea, rather than a more limited Russian-nationalist idea, will justify itself). Strelkov himself does little to supply (help) the fighters, he has too many political conversations, ill-considered "ideas" ... This hinders the movement - extreme anti-Ukrainianism and other mistakes repel those who would like to help financially the fighters of the Lao PDR. It is necessary (or useful) to create some other movement to help the fighters of the LPNR, which would not be fixated on the shooters' "geopolitical projects of the future" with their certain mistakes and overlaps ...

On November 12, 2014, the official website of the public movement "Novorossiya" headed by Igor Ivanovich Strelkov began its work. The site is hosted at. This site is the official information resource of the public movement, which will post reports on the work done and publish requests for humanitarian assistance. In the near future, the resource will publish a register of official representatives of the public movement "Novorossiya" in Russian cities and regional centers, who will coordinate the collection and dispatch of humanitarian aid to the cities of Novorossia.

On the social movement "Novorossiya"

On October 30, 2014, in the capital of our Motherland, Moscow, the founding congress of the public movement "Novorossiya", created by citizens and public associations of Russia and headed by Igor Ivanovich Strelkov, was held. I would like to emphasize that the movement is not politicized and sets itself, in the main, goals of a humanitarian and social nature. The name of the organization is consonant with the main direction of activity chosen by its founders - providing all-round assistance to the residents of Novorossiya who rebelled against the bloody Kiev regime.

The prerequisites for the creation of such a movement arose long ago and they are due, first of all, to the urgent need to systematize the collection and transfer of humanitarian aid to the cities of Novorossiya. In connection with the absence of any system, unified and closed, certain problems arose. More or less "highlighted" in in social networks militia units and health facilities received humanitarian aid with enviable regularity, sometimes even in quantities exceeding their need, and those who could not post their requests on the Internet were left without any supplies. Another important reason is the huge number of fraudsters who, hiding behind good motives and the names of decent people, collect money and humanitarian supplies throughout Russia, which are not at all for humanitarian purposes. It is painfully insulting when the collected good people, bought with the last money, is then sold or even thrown into a landfill.

The primary tasks of the participants in the Novorossiya movement are to create a unified, transparent and efficient system for collecting and distributing humanitarian aid, providing assistance to refugees, and supporting the wounded undergoing treatment in Russian clinics. Already today, work is underway to unite those humanitarian workers, ordinary citizens and organizations that for many months civil war, have proven themselves only from the best side. By pooling the resources of many, we will be able to build an impeccable system that in the near future will postpone the impending humanitarian catastrophe in Novorossiya.

Why Igor Ivanovich Strelkov? Will the former Minister of the DPR Armed Forces, a man of war, be able to lead a movement that sets itself purely peaceful goals? I have been asked this question more than once. I believe that Strelkov is exactly the figure who can not only lead the humanitarian movement, but also bring it to a qualitatively new level. A patriot of his country, a man of exceptional decency, for whom honor is not an empty phrase, will become just that guarantor who will not leave anyone in doubt that all the collected goods and funds will be delivered to their destination.


If you collect humanitarian supplies, pursuing only one goal - to help civilians and soldiers of Novorossia, if your main requirement is that the aid you have collected should be delivered to those who need it most, pour into social movement"Novorossiya", headed by Igor Ivanovich Strelkov. In unity, strength and victory!

Not so long ago, a press conference was held on the Novorossiya movement led by Igor Strelkov.

Judging by the microphones on the table, priority in the coverage of the conference was given to two TV channels: RBC and TsarGrad TV.

Ilya Kuzmenkov, editor-in-chief of the TV channel Tsargrad TV, told the Dozhd TV channel the details of the participation of the former producer of the American Fox News TV channel Jack Hanik in this project.

Jack Hanick is one of the founders of the American Fox News television channel, where he has worked for 15 years since 1996.

Konstantin Malofeev is a sponsor of Strelkov, is the creator of the Tsar-Grad TV channel.

The channel will have an "Orthodox" -monarchical orientation.

The channel will be run by Hanick, a Catholic from the United States, who is obviously inscribed in the media elite of America's conservatives.

Do you think the producer and director of the largest American news channel Fox News, who is a member of the US elite, will work for the good of our country? And why would a Catholic American need an "Orthodox" monarchy in Russia?

And in general, in order to establish a monarchy, it is necessary to change the foundations of the constitutional order. Usually they are changed in a revolutionary way. It turns out that Strelkov needs a revolution? This idea can be confirmed by the presence at the conference of the coordinator of the National Liberation Movement, a fighter for, calling for a fight against the "occupation" power, revolutionary deputy Yevgeny Fyodorov. At 28:50 sec. we can see him perform. Evgeny Alekseevich always avoids answering the question: "What will happen after the victory?"

In this aspect, I would like to talk about the ideologists of the GCD. For example, in the structure of the Central School of the NOD, there is the head of the direction of visual agitation and propaganda - Kinsburskiy Andrey Vladimirovich.

And here are the publications of the head of the GCD campaign, on the website of the Academy of Trinitarianism.


In his works, he openly attacks Orthodoxy, expresses anti-Christian, neo-pagan ideas, distorts the history of Russia.

Take at least one article - "Goys or Outcasts."


“But comparatively quite recently, even in pre-Petrine times, Moscow Russia (then Moscow Tartary) was the western periphery of Great Tartary.<…>But apparently, even several centuries before this map was drawn, the influence of Vedic Tartary, that is, the power of the goyim, the power of the white race, extended to almost all of Europe.<…>


And then there are yogis, that is, it seems like the same goyim, but topsy-turvy. Goyim stand on their feet, and yogis strive on their heads. And then there are some outcasts. Either these are those who are from the goyim, or those who were driven from the goyim.<…>


And a thousand years ago, the newly minted Orthodox Christian Russian Church itself was engaged in this (murder of people - prime minister). And when Vladimir the Bloody introduced it by force on the lands of Vedic Kievan Rus, he killed so many people in ten years that a whole third of Russian settlements and cities disappeared completely. "


And Andrey concludes this way: "the future belongs to the Russian civilization, to the revived Orthodox Slavic Vedism, to the new Aryan paradigm and Russian science."

What to say? Long live the Russian Ahnenerbe, which is being promoted by the Izborsk Club. And here I must add that Strelkov himself was published back in the 90s in the newspaper Zavtra, the editor-in-chief of which is the leader of Izbor residents, Alexander Prokhanov. Conductor of the conference - Vladimir Khomyakov, also from this team, he is one of the experts of the Russian doctrine, which is promoted by the "Izborsk Club", we have already written about the anti-Christian essence of the document.


And if Khomyakov is only one of the experts, then its author also spoke at the conference (1:25:40). This is another member of the Izborsk Club, blogger Maxim Kalashnikov (Vladimir Kucherenko). His speech was revolutionary in content: he proposed issuing a civil ultimatum to the Kremlin and creating a National Guard headed by Strelkov, creating a government of popular confidence.


Maxim himself is a fairly straightforward comrade and does not hide the fact that he is a fascist.


Also, from his previous publications, assertions follow about the need for advanced innovative development of Russia, the transition to a new historical era "Neuromir" (Neurosoc).

Let us recall the recent PR of the Neuromir resource by Mr. Strelkov. When the Politring with Starikov took place under the color of the banners of the "Right Sector".


But back to the conference, where Vika Tsyganova's husband, Vadim Tsyganov, also spoke (46:50). He said that there is some sacred knowledge about the collision that is taking place (in Ukraine - author's note), and that based on this knowledge, we will win. What is this sacred knowledge? Isn't it the rhetoric of Alexander Prokhanov?

Here it is appropriate to recall some of the events at which we saw among the lecturers and Alexander Prokhanov and other neo-fascists, and among them, for some reason, and Vadim Tsyganov.


Further (47:43) Vadim said that the Russians “see the divine seal” and called for breaking the blockade of all central channels (Fedorov’s rhetoric) in March at a rally-concert at the Cathedral of Christ the Savior.

Moreover, despite the fact that most of the speakers share anti-Christian ideas, including Strelkov himself, Girkin nevertheless emphasized that the activities of the organizers of the movement received blessings from the highest hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church, while he did not say how and from whom.

After the completion of Kalashnikov's speech, Khomyakov wanted to give another word to the famous Eurasian - Korovin, but the latter did not wait and left. Let us remind you who the Eurasians are, their leader is, by the way, also a member of the Izborsk Club.

But back to the conference, at it (2:57:00) there was a question for Strelkov about the assessment of Putin's policy.

Girkin replied that the tactics of the authorities' actions are harmful for the country and lead to a worsening of the situation in Russia. He said that the assistants (probably Surkov - author's note) are doing this tactical policy, and that these assistants work on the basis of their views, without asking Putin. Then the question was asked: "What prevents you from replacing these people?" Strelkov replied that the question was not for him.

That is, the bottom line is that, according to Strelkov, the traitors around Putin are pursuing a sabotage course, but for some reason he does not change them.

At the same time, Igor Strelkov does not say today that Putin is a traitor, he acts differently - he claims that there are traitors around Putin (Surkov - author's note), and then the consumers of Strelkov's propaganda should have a logical question: “Why is Putin with does nothing to be traitors? " and the corresponding answer options: “Putin is powerless” (Fedorov’s rhetoric), or “Putin has passed” (the rhetoric of tougher nationalists).

Igor Strelkov spoke about the fact that Vladislav Surkov was the traitor at the Politring with Nikolai Starikov. Here one recalls the not so long ago shouts of white ribbon workers leaving the American embassy. They also shouted: "you are Surkov's propaganda" and called on to fight Putin.

But this is today, Igor Strelkov began to speak more softly in relation to the President. Here's what he said earlier.

Website forum-antikvariat.ru, archive for 2010-2012, forum member under the pseudonym “Kotych”. He is also a colonel of the FSB Girkin I.V.






That is, Igor Strelkov openly called Vladimir Putin a traitor who slowly surrenders the country to the Americans, because he wants to remain in power until the end. Strelkov argued that a revolution is needed, then a military dictatorship and, of course, a tsar, and "Vova is not good for this - his time has gone." This is how it turns out.

Considering that all this movement is surrounded by supporters of the idea of ​​building a World Theocratic State in Russia, radical in relation to the Russian Orthodox Church, and those seeking to put occult forces at the service of the Empire, it is not necessary to speak of any positive role of this movement. However, as usual, wolves dress in sheep's skins so that, under good excuses,.